Pushpalatha S. Jain v. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petitioner challenging Permanent Lok Adalat order failing to restrain insurer-operated service center from removing damaged car; court directed LA to decide interim safekeeping application by specified date.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021/23RD MAGHA,1942 WP(C).No.27681 OF 2020(I)
PETITIONER:
PUSHPALATHA S. JAIN, AGED 70 YEARS, W/O. LATE SHANTHI VARMA JAIN, KALYANA MANDIRAM, PUSPHA ESTATE, KALPETTA NORTH, WAYANAD – 673 122.
BY ADVS. SRI.SHYAM PADMAN SRI.C.M.ANDREWS SMT.BOBY M.SEKHAR KUM.LAYA MARY JOSEPH SRI.HARISH ABRAHAM
RESPONDENTS:
1 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., GE PLAZA, AIRPORT ROAD, YERAWADA, PUNE – 411 006.
2 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., 3RD FLOOR, COASTAL CHAMBERS, OPP. MERCY ESTATE, PERUMANOOR P.O., MG ROAD, ERNAKULAM – 682 015.
- 3 E.V.M. AUTOCRAFT INDIA PVT. LTD., 23/649 A1, ANGEL PLAZA, NH 47, SOUTH KALAMASSERY, KOCHI – 682 022.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ court can substitute the decision of the Permanent Lok Adalat regarding safekeeping of the damaged vehicle and direct it to remove the refusal order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Puspsalata S. Jain
- respondent
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd.
- respondent
E.V.M. Autocraft India Pvt. Ltd.
- respondent
Navnit Moters Pvt. Ltd.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court