Disposed

Pentalegacy Private Limited v. Indian Bank

Kerala HC13 Jan 2021WP(C)/25895/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a company, filed a writ petition against the respondent bank seeking a direction to grant time for installment payments pending a decision in another writ case. The court recorded that the bank had already extended payment time until April 2020 and closed the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed on the record; no interim orders or directions issued.

Pentalegacy Private Limited Vs Indian Bank — Banking and Recovery | Kerala HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 23TH POUSHA, 1942

¶5

WP(C).No.25895 OF 2020(J)

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

PENTALEGACY PRIVATE LIMITED CLA CAMPUS, ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK, 2/75A, CHATHANPADU, KONCHIRA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695615, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MOHAMMED RIJU.

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.A.RAJASIMHAN

¶9

RESPONDENT:

¶10

INDIAN BANK

¶11

NALANCHIRA BRANCH, NALANCHIRA BRANCH, NALANCHIRA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695015, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER.

¶12

BY ADV. SRI.S.EASWARAN

¶13

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

WP(C).No.25895 OF 2020(J)

J U D G M E N T

following reliefs:

(1) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider Ext.P8 request and to grant time for payment of installment sought therein till a decision is taken in Ext.P6 judgment.

¶19

(2) Issue such other orders or directions which this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.

¶20

Learned counsel for the respondent submitted

¶21

that the Bank has already given time for payment till April 20201.

¶22

This writ petition is closed, recording the

¶23

same.

¶24

Sd/- P.V.ASHA, JUDGE

¶25

¶26

WP(C).No.25895 OF 2020(J)

¶27

¶28

APPENDIX

¶29

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶30

EXHIBIT	P1 TRUE COPY OF THE	GECL SCHEME.
EXHIBIT	P2 TRUE COPY OF THE GUIDELINES OF EME GUARANTEE SCHEME.	OPERATIONAL RGENCY CREDIT LINE
EXHIBIT	P3 TRUE COPY OF THE DOR.BP.BC.NO.76/2 DATED 21.6.2020 I BANK OF INDIA.	CIRCULAR 1.06.201/2019-20 SSUED BY THE RESERVE
EXHIBIT	P4 TRUE COPY OF THE 23.9.2020 ISSUED THE PETITIONER.	SANCTION TICKET DATED BY THE RESPONDENT TO
EXHIBIT	P5 TRUE COPY OF THE 23.9.2020 ISSUED THE PETITIONER.	LETTER DATED BY THE RESPONDENT TO
EXHIBIT	P6 TRUE COPY OF THE NO.20700/2020 OF DATED 10.11.2020.	JUDGMENT IN WP(C) THIS HON'BLE COURT
EXHIBIT	P7 TRUE COPY OF THE 16.10.2020 ISSUED THE PETITIONER.	LETTER DATED BY THE RESPONDENT TO
EXHIBIT	P8 TRUE COPY OF THE DATED 17.11.2020 PETITIONER TO THE	REPLY AND REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT.

¶31

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶32

EXHIBIT R1(A)	TRUE COPY OF 10.04.2018	SANCTION TICKET DATED
EXHIBIT R1(B)	TRUE COPY OF 23.10.2019.	SANCTION TICKET DATED

Pentalegacy Private Limited v. Indian Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pentalegacy Private Limited v. Indian Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raju Vs the Regional Office of Kerala State Financial Enterprises Ltd.

Arjun K.Rathish Lal Vs State of Kerala

Faisal Abdul Kader Vs the District Level Authorization Committee

Arunmughan Vs Reghuraman

K.K.Prasannan, Vs the Manager

Mushthak.M.P Vs Vattamkulam Grama Panchayat