Dismissed
Sakeer v. Pallarimangalam Grama Panchayat
Kerala HCWP(C)/25109/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Held that the writ petition was not pressed and dismissed it on 11.01.2021.
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 21TH POUSHA, 1942
WP(C).No.25109 OF 2020(K)
PETITIONERS:
2 MUHAMMED ALI SHAMNAD, S/O. ALIYAR, NEDUNGATTUKUDI (H), OKKAL P.O. ERNAKULAM.
BY ADVS. SRI.ENOCH DAVID SIMON JOEL SRI.S.SREEDEV SRI.RONY JOSE
RESPONDENTS:
1 PALLARIMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT PALLARIMANGALAM, KOOVALLOOR P.O. ERNAKULAM 686 671. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY.
2 SECRETARY, PALLARIMANGALAM GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PALLARIMANGALAM, KOOVALLOOR P.O. ERNAKULAM 686 671.
SMT. G. RANJITA GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.25109 OF 2020(K)
..2..
Writ Petition (C) No.25109 of 2020
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition is not pressed. In the light of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE
ds 11.01.2021
Saakeer, Ahmed
Muhammed Ali Shamnad
Pallarimangalam Grama Panchayat
G. Ranjita
P.B.Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court