The petitioner states that she was appointed as UPSA in a permanent vacancy in the Kanarka Senior Basic School, Muthanthara on 03.06.2013. She states that she has continuously worked till 31.05.2014 and thereafter, she availed of leave in order to join her spouse working in the Indian Air Force. She later rejoined the service on 1.2.2016. The petitioner contends that the 2nd respondent has issued directions to the Manager to initiate disciplinary action against the petitioner on the premise that she had not obtained sanction. According to the petitioner, the Government had approved the leave as per Ext.P2 order and her appointment had been approved by the AEO with effect from 03.06.2013. However, her grievance is that the AEO had rejected the disbursement of salary and other benefits due to the petitioner by Ext.P4 order. Being aggrieved, the petitioner is stated to have preferred Ext.P5 revision petition before the 1st respondent. Though various other reliefs are sought, the limited request of the petitioner is for issuance of directions to the 1st respondent to consider Exhibit-P5 and pass orders expeditiously.
