Prakash v. the District Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala closed the writ petition due to the expiration of the petitioner and advised legal heirs to initiate appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 15TH ASWINA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 17640 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
PRAKASH, AGED 50 YEARS S/O. SANKARAN NAIR, FLAT NO.511, POORVA GRAND BAY APPARTMENT, MARINE DRIVE, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 018 BY ADVS. E.S.SANEEJ S.LEKHA
RESPONDENTS:
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.10.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 17640 OF 2021
2
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J ===========================
W.P.(C) No.17640 of 2021
Dated this the 7th day of October, 2021
JUDGMENT
It is submitted that writ petitioner has expired. The
learned Government Pleader points out that the appeal
ought to have been filed before the RTO and not the
District Collector as was done by writ petitioner.
shall stand closed, reserving liberty of the legal heirs of
the petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings before
the appropriate Authority.
Sd/BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JUDGE
AMV/07/10/2021
WP(C) NO. 17640 OF 2021
3
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 17640/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
| Exhibit P1 Exhibit P2 |
TRUE CERTI B 269 TRUE SECTI DATED |
PHOTOCOP FICATE OF PHOTOCOPY ON 7 OF 17.11.202 |
Y OF THE REGISTRATION THE VEHICLE WITH NO.KL 40 OF THE DEMAND NOTICE UNDER THE REVENUE RECOVERY ACT 0. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exhibit P3 | TRUE SECTI DATED |
PHOTOCOPY ON 34 OF 17.11.202 |
OF THE DEMAND NOTICE UNDER THE REVENUE RECOVERY ACT 0. |
| Exhibit P4 | TRUE SUBMI OFFIC |
PHOTOCOP TTED BEFO ER, PERUMB |
Y OF THE REPRESENTATION RE THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AVOOR, DATED 11.08.2021. |
| Exhibit P5 | TRUE SUBMI 20.08 |
PHOTOCOPY TTED BEFOR .2021. |
OF THE APPEAL PETITION E THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED |
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS : NIL
1 provisions across 1 enactments
PRAKASH
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT
THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), KANAYANNUR TALUK
TAXATION OFFICER, SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE
THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ERNAKULAM VILLAGE
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court