Disposed

K.Sabarinathan v. District Collector

Kerala HC23 Sept 2021WP(C)/15402/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court held that although the National Trust Act does not expressly vest power to sanction asset sales, such power is inherent in the Local Level Committee to protect ward interests. The court directed the petitioner to approach the Committee for sanction to sell ward property for the consideration received in a prior settlement.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of by declaring the Local Level Committee has power to sanction sale of ward assets and directing the petitioner to approach the Committee.

K.Sabarinathan Vs District Collector — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2021)

¶1

C. R.

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN

¶5

THURSDAY, THE 23^RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 1ST ASWINA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 15402 OF 2021

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

K.SABARINATHAN AGED 55 YEARS S/O.NATESAN MENON, NANDANAM, KALVAKULAM ROAD, KOPPAN, PALAKKAD, KERALA - 678 001.

¶8

BY ADVS. VINOD VALLIKAPPAN ALEXANDER KOSHY

¶9

RESPONDENT:

¶10

DISTRICT COLLECTOR,

¶11

PALAKKAD, OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION, PALAKKAD - 678 001.

¶12

BY SMT.SHEEJA C.S., SR. GOVT. PLEADER BY SRI.V.RAMKUMAR NAMBIAR, AMICUS CURIAE BY SMT.SATYASREE PRIYA, AMICUS CURIAE

¶13

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

C. R.

¶15

SATHISH NINAN, J.

¶16

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W. P. (C) No.15402 of 2021 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 23^rd day of September, 2021

¶17

J U D G M E N T

¶18

Petitioner is the father of Sri.S.Neeraj who was born mentally retarded (hereinafter referred to as “the special child”). Suprabha, the wife of the petitioner and the mother of the special child, expired on 08.01.1999. An extent of 3 acres of property belonged jointly to Suprabha, her brother and their mother (hereinafter referred to as, “wife”, “brother-in-law” and “mother-in-law”, respectively). After the death of the wife, in the year 2006 and 2008 the brother-in-law and mother-in-law executed registered sale deeds with respect to the property in favour of strangers. At that time the special child was a minor and the sale deeds were executed by the mother-in-law as his guardian. In the year 2009, the petitioners mother-in-law and brother-in-law filed a suit as OS 741/2009 before the

¶19

W. P. (C) No.15402 of 2021 -: 2 :-

¶20

Sub Court, Thrissur against the petitioner and the special child as defendants, seeking a relief for partition in respect of certain other item of property. Subsequently the petitioner, on his own behalf and as the guardian of the special child, who was then a minor, filed OS 1701/2012 for partition treating the sale deeds

¶21

of 2006 and 2008 first above referred to as void.

¶22

Pending the suits the parties arrived at a

¶23

settlement. As per the settlement, the petitioner did not claim any share in the property. The value of the share of the special child over the properties was fixed at `10 lakhs. The sub court as per order on IA 5884/13 permitted the petitioner to sign the compromise for and on behalf of the special child. It appears that, the fact that the special child is mentally challenged was not brought to the notice of the Court. Be that as it may, the fact remains that the suit ended in a compromise. In compliance with the terms of the

¶24

W. P. (C) No.15402 of 2021

¶25

-: 3 :-

¶26

compromise, an amount of `10 lakhs, being the share of the minor, was deposited in a Bank-HDFC Bank, Palakkad Town, R.S. Road as a Fixed Deposit. The Fixed Deposit

¶27

receipt was produced before the court noting a lien in favour of the court. The same has been observed in the judgment passed on compromise in the suit OS 741/2009. A copy of the said judgment is produced along with the writ petition as Ext.P4.

¶28

In the year 2017, on the application of the petitioner under Section 14 of the National Trust for

¶29

the Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities Act, 1999, (hereinafter referred to as “the National Trust Act”) the petitioner was appointed as the legal guardian of the special child. Since neither at the time of execution of the sale deeds in the year 2006 and 2008 or at the time of the compromise before the Sub Court, Thrissur, in OS 741/09, any guardian in terms of the

¶30

W. P. (C) No.15402 of 2021

¶31

-: 4 :-

¶32

National Trust Act was appointed for the special child, petitioners seek for a direction from this Court to the respondent who is the Chairman of the local level committee under the National Trust Act for sanction to

¶33

execute a conveyance in favour of the assignees under the 2006 and 2008 sale deeds for the consideration of

¶34

`10 lakhs received under the compromise in OS 741/09.

¶35

Heard Sri.Vinod Vallikkappan, learned counsel

¶36

for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader and Sri.V.Ramkumar Nambiar and Smt.Satyasree Priya, learned Amicus Curiae.

¶37

The learned Amicus Curiae points out that,

¶38

neither the National Trust Act nor the Rules made thereunder specifically provide for grant of sanction

¶39

for sale of assets of the Wards dealt with thereunder. In the absence of any specific provision or a direction from this Court clarifying the powers of the Local Level Committee constituted under the National Trust Act, they

¶40

W. P. (C) No.15402 of 2021

¶41

-: 5 :-

¶42

would be unable to consider the request if any made for sanction, points out the learned Amicus Curiae.

¶43

As per Ext.P1 certificate of appointment of the

¶44

petitioner as the legal guardian of the special child, the obligations of the legal guardian has been mentioned

¶45

thus:-

¶46

“3. Obligations of the Legal Guardian

¶47

√(a) Maintenance and care of the person

¶48

√(b) Management of the immovable property

¶49

√(c) Management of movable property (d) Any others”

¶50

Noticeably, serial No.3(b) deals with the obligation

¶51

of the legal guardian regarding management of immovable property of the special child. But for casting an obligation to take care of the assets, there is no

¶52

express provision under the National Trust Act or the

¶53

Rules thereunder, for dealing with the assets of the

¶54

Ward dealt with therein. Section 14 of the National

¶55

W. P. (C) No.15402 of 2021

¶56

-: 6 :-

¶57

Trust Act provides for appointment of guardian. Section 15 enumerates the duties of a guardian, which includes, care of the assets of the ward. Section 16 mandates the

¶58

guardian to file periodical returns giving the details of the assets of the subject. Sections 14 to 16 of the National Trust Act reads thus,

¶59

“14. Appointment for guardianship— (1) A parent of a person with disability or his relative may make an application to the Local Level Committee for appointment of any person of his choice to act as a guardian of the persons with disability.

¶60

(2) Any registered organization may make an application in the prescribed form to the Local Level Committee for appointment of a guardian for a person with disability:

¶61

Provided that no such application shall be entertained by the Local Level Committee, unless the consent of the guardian of the disabled person is also obtained.

¶62

(3) While considering the application for appointment of a guardian, the Local Level

¶63

W. P. (C) No.15402 of 2021

¶64

-: 7 :-

¶65

— Committee shall consider

¶66

(a) whether the person with disability needs a guardian;

¶67

(b) the purposes for which the guardianship is required for person with disability.

¶68

(4) The Local Level Committee shall receive, process and decide applications received under sub-sections (1) and (2), in such manner as may be determined by regulations:

¶69

Provided that while making recommendation for the appointment of a guardian, the Local Level Committee shall provide for the obligations which are to be fulfilled by the guardian.

¶70

(5) The Local Level Committee shall send to the Board the particulars of the applications received by it and orders passed thereon at such interval as may be determined by regulations.

¶71

15. Duties of guardian— Every person appointed as a guardian of a person with disability under this Chapter shall, wherever required, either have the care of such person with disability and his property or be responsible for the maintenance of the person with disability.

¶72

W. P. (C) No.15402 of 2021

¶73

-: 8 :-

¶74

16. Guardian to furnish inventory and annual accounts.— (1) Every person appointed as a guardian under section 14 shall, within a period of six months from the date of his appointment, deliver to the authority which appointed him, an inventory of immovable property belonging to the person with disability, and all assets and other movable property received on behalf of the person with disability, together with a statement of all claims due to all and debts and liabilities due by such person with disability.

¶75

(2) Every guardian shall also furnish to the said appointing authority within a period of three months at the close of every financial year, an account of the property and assets in his charge, the sums received and disbursed on account of the person with disability and the balance remaining with him. ”

¶76

The guardian is thus made responsible for the

¶77

maintenance of the assets of the subject and is required to submit periodical reports regarding the assets of the subject. Situations would arise where for various

¶78

W. P. (C) No.15402 of 2021 -: 9 :-

¶79

reasons including, to find a financial source for the proper care and maintenance of the Ward, the assets of the Ward or a portion thereof would be required to be dealt with by way of sale or otherwise. However, there is no express provision under the National Trust Act or the Rules thereunder, enabling the same. When the guardian is answerable to the Local Level Committee, and periodical monitoring at the hands of the Committee is contemplated, it requires to be read into the powers of the Committee, the power to grant sanction for dealing with the assets of the Ward by the guardian appointed under Section 14 of the National Trust Act. Though express powers in the said regard have not been specifically vested in the committee, on the scheme of the Act it must be understood to be vested with the Committee. Therefore it is declared that, the Local Level Committee under the National Trust Act, has the power to grant or refuse sanction to a guardian to deal

¶80

W. P. (C) No.15402 of 2021

¶81

-: 10 :-

¶82

with the assets of the Ward. Of course, whether in a given case sanction is to be granted or not, is for the Committee to consider on appreciating the entire facts of each case.

¶83

The power to grant or refuse sanction to deal

¶84

with the assets of the Ward, having been held to vest with the Local Level Committee, it is for the petitioner to approach the Committee with a proper application on production of all the relevant materials including those to convince the Committee that the interests of the Ward is adequately safeguarded and protected, and that the transaction is in the best interests of the Ward. The petitioner could seek for permission to execute conveyance of the rights of the subject over the property conveyed under sale deeds of the year 2006 and 2008 referred to first above for the consideration of `10 lakhs received as per the settlement in OS 741/09. If such a request is made, the Local Level Committee

¶85

W. P. (C) No.15402 of 2021 -: 11 :-

¶86

shall consider the entire facts, the sufficiency of the consideration, and pass appropriate orders. The committee shall, while considering the application, give notice of the proceedings to the assignees under the sale deeds of the year 2006 and 2008 referred to above and also the plaintiffs in OS 741/2009 of the Sub Court, Thrissur.

¶87

The writ petition is ordered as above.

¶88

Sd/- SATHISH NINAN JUDGE

kns/-

//True Copy//

P.S. to Judge

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 15402/2021

¶93

PETITIONER EXHIBITS

¶94

Exhibit P1	TRUE COPY CERTIFICATE	OF NO.LLC	THE LEGAL GUARDIANSHIP /TGT/266/06/17 (PRO) DATED
	12/06/2017 RESPONDENT.	ISSUED	BY THE OFFICE OF THE
Exhibit P2	TRUE COPY O RS.10 LAKHS 18/05/2013.	F THE IN THE	FIXED DEPOSIT RECEIPT OF NAME OF THE CHILD DATED
Exhibit P3	TRUE COPY OF THE RESPONDE 2020 WITH AC	THE AP NT BY KNOWLED	PLICATION SUBMITTED BEFORE THE PETITIONER IN NOVEMBER GMENT.

K.Sabarinathan v. District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Sabarinathan v. District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saraswathi Vs the Joint Registrar (General)

Saraswathi Vs the Joint Registrar (General)

Saraswathi Vs the Joint Registrar (General)

Biju Varghese Vs Jijo Jose

Sunabha Vs the Presiding Officer(Sub Collector)

Akhila.P Vs Regional Officer