Petitioners filed a writ petition. The Court observed that the writ petition had become infructuous and consequently dismissed it without addressing substantive legal arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 1ST MAGHA, 1942
WP(C).No.15254 OF 2020(F)
PETITIONERS:
BY ADVS. SRI.JACOB P.ALEX SRI.JOSEPH P.ALEX SHRI.MANU SANKAR P.
RESPONDENTS:
W.P.(C) No.15254 of 2020
2
R1 BY SHRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, SC,K.S.E.COMM R3 BY ADV. SRI.ASOK M.CHERIAN R3 BY ADV. SRI.N.SATHEESH R4 BY ADV. SRI.VIVEK VARGHESE P.J. R4 BY ADV. SRI.VARUGHESE M EASO SMT. RANJITHA GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 21.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) No.15254 of 2020
3
W.P.(C) No.15254 of 2020
J U D G M E N T
It is seen that the writ petition has become infructuous. It is, accordingly dismissed.
Sd/P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.
ds 21.01.2021
W.P.(C) No.15254 of 2020
4
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20.07.2020 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 22.07.2020 GIVEN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE SECRETARY OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT GRAMA PANCHAYATH INTIMATING THE RESULTS OF THE ELECTION ALONG WITH THE MINUTES.
RACHEL BOBAN
THOMAS JACOB
STATE ELECTION COMMISSION KERALA
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, PULLAD
PURAMATTOM GRAMA PANCHAYAT
JOLLY JOHN
P.B.SURESH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
