Riyasu v. M/S. Shriram Transport Finance
Case brief
What is this about?
Equivalent to a two-line order dismissing the writ petition as infructuous. The court found the matter infectuous and issued no other directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 5TH AGRAHAYANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 1521 OF 2013
PETITIONER:
RIYASU
AGED 30 YEARS
S/O.ABDULLAKUTTY, ANDI PARAMBIL HOUSE, PURATHOOR
P.O., TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV SRI.JAMSHEED HAFIZ
RESPONDENTS:
1 M/S. SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO.LTD REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SRI.VIJAYA KUMAR V.M., S/O.APPU NAIR, CONSULTANT-LEGAL M/S.SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO.LTD., 1ST FLOOR, RAINBOW COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, NADUVILANGADI, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 676 105.2 KUNHAYISA W/O.ABDULLAKUTTY, ANDI PARAMBIL HOUSE, PURATHOOR P.O., PIN - 676 102, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.BY ADV SRI.RAJESH NAMBIAR
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 26.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C).No.1521/2013
2
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J.
-------------------------------W.P.(C).No.1521 of 2013
---------------------------------------------Dated this the 26th day of November, 2021
JUDGMENT
The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
matter is infructuous.
Therefore, this writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous.
JV
sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE
RIYASU
M/S. SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO.LTD
KUNHAYISA
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court