Disposed

C.K.Vijayan v. Commissioner of Police

Kerala HC1 Mar 2021WP(C)/1514/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging biased investigation by the 8th respondent. The court noted the respondent was relieved of duty on 7.2.2021 and a new officer took charge by 10.2.2021. The grievance is deemed allayed, and the petition is closed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is closed as the grievance regarding the investigation is allayed due to the relief of the 8th respondent from office.

C.K.Vijayan Vs Commissioner of Police — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Kerala HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN

¶4

MONDAY, THE 01ST DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 10TH PHALGUNA, 1942

¶5

WP(C).No.1514 OF 2021(L)

¶6

PETITIONER/S:

¶7

1 C.K.VIJAYAN AGED 58 YEARS S/O. KRISHNAN KUTTY, FLAT -6A, VIJAYA GLIMPSES, JAWAHAR NAGAR, KADAVANTHARA, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE-682 020

¶8

2 SALINI VIJAYAN, AGED 48 YEARS

¶9

W/O. C.K. VIJAYAN, FLAT-6A, VIJAYA GLIMPSES, JAWAHAR NAGAR, KADAVANTHARA, ELAMKULAM VILLAGE-682 020

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.L.RAJESH NARAYAN

¶11

RESPONDENT/S:

¶12

1 COMMISSIONER OF POLICE KOCHI CITY, O/O. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, REVENUE TOWER, OPP.CHILDRENS PARK, KOCHI-682 011

¶13

2 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, KOCHI CITY , O/O. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, REVENUE TOWER, OPP. CHILDRENS PARK, KOCHI-682 011

¶14

3 STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MARADU POLICE STATION, P.A. ULLAHAN ROAD, NEAR GOVT. VHSS, MARADU-682 304

¶15

4 RADHAKRISHNAN KANDOTH, KALHARAM KANDOTH, PATTUPURACKAL ROAD, THEKKUMBHAGOM, TRIPUNITHURA-682 301

¶16

5 PREETHA RADHAKRISHNAN, W/O. RADHAKRISHNAN, KALHARAM KANDOTH, PATTUPURACKAL ROAD, THEKKUMBHAGOM, TRIPUNITHURA-682 301

¶17

6 BINU RAMACHANDRAN, AGED 45 YEARS, D/O. RAMACHANDRAN, AZHAKATHU HOUSE, JANARDANAPURAM TEMPLE ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001

¶18

WP(C).No.1514 OF 2021(L)

¶19

¶20

7 A.S. MOHANACHANDRAN, AGED 54 YEARS KANDOTH (H), KANNANKULANGARA WEST, TRIPUNITHURA, ERNAKULAM-682 301

¶21

8 C. VINOD, INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MARADU SHO, ERNAKULAM-682 301

¶22

9 K.S. BABU, AGED 53 YEARS CHANJAMATTATHIL(H), PIRAVAM THOTTABHAGAM, ERNAKULAM-686 664.

¶23

10 C.K. SIBI, AGED 49 YEARS FLAT NO. 7D, VIJAYA GLIMPSES, JAWAHAR NAGAR, KADAVANTHARA, ERNAKULAM-682 020

¶24

11 ASWATHY, AGED 19 YEARS D/O SIVANANDAN, ANGADISSERI (H), MANAL VAYAL, IRULAM P.O, WAYANAD-673 592

¶25

R1-3, R8 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER

¶26

OTHER PRESENT:

¶27

PP T.R.RENJITH

¶28

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶29

WP(C).No.1514 OF 2021(L)

¶30

¶31

JUDGMENT

¶32

Dated this the 1^st day of March, 2021

¶33

The grievance of the petitioner is against the manner in which the crimes registered against them is being investigated by the 8^th respondent. According to the petitioner, the investigation is being conducted in a biased manner. The learned Public Prosecutor submits, on instructions, that the 8^th respondent was relieved from the office of SHO, Maradu Police Station on 7.2.2021 and a new officer has taken charge on 10.2.2021. In such circumstances, the grievance of the petitioner stands allayed.

¶34

This is recorded and the writ petition is closed.

¶35

Sd/- V.G ARUN JUDGE

¶36

¶37

WP(C).No.1514 OF 2021(L)

¶38

¶39

APPENDIX

¶40

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

¶41

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR NO. 606/2020 DATED 3.10.2020. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 2.11.2020 IN B.A. NO. 6695/2020 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPANY PETITION NO. 40/KOB/2020 DATED 1.10.2020. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 6.11.2020 OF THE HON'BLE NCLT. EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 6.11.2020. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 9.11.2020. EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF 2ND PETITIONERS ACCOUNTS. EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF 3RD PETITIONERS ACCOUNTS. EXHIBIT P9 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 12.11.2020. EXHIBIT P10 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 2.12.2020. EXHIBIT P11 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 14.12.2020. EXHIBIT P12 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DATED 15.1.2021

C.K.Vijayan v. Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.K.Vijayan v. Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Krishnan Vs State of Kerala

Harikrishnan M. Vs State of Kerala

Mohammed Roshan Vs State of Kerala

Vishnu K.B Vs State of Kerala

Vini Joseph Vs the State of Kerala

Fidvi Fazal Vs State of Kerala