Energy Development Co. Ltd. v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner, representing Energy Development Co. Ltd., filed a writ petition. The court noted that payments were made subsequent to the filing, and the petitioner sought not to prosecute. Consequently, the writ petition was closed.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is closed as payments have been made and the petitioner does not want to prosecute it.