Writ petition challenging a tender provision dismissed as infructuous after respondents deleted the ips `, causing the impugned issue to become moot.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
THURSDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 8TH MAGHA, 1942
WP(C).No.1398 OF 2021(Y)
PETITIONERS:
S.R.VENUGOPALA PRABHU, AGED 77 YEARS, S/O.S.A.RENGANATHA PRABHU, PROPRIETOR, M/S.NATIONAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS A1/71, MULLASSERY CANAL ROAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 011.
BY ADVS. SRI.REJI GEORGE SRI.BINOY DAVIS SRI.RAMU RAJENDRAN
RESPONDENTS:
1 THE KERALA INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIN (KINFRA), KINFRA HOUSE, TC 31/2312, SASTHAMANGALAM, VELLAYAMBALAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 010.
2 KERALA INDUSTRIAL AND TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY ORGANIZATION (KITCO), REGD. OFFICE AT FEMITH'S, P3 NO.4407, PUTHIYA ROAD, CHAKKARAPARAMBU, VENNALA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN – 682 028.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.U.SHAILAJAN SRI.NIBIN GEORGE
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.01.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No.1398 OF 2021(Y)
2
JUDGMENT
As the learned counsel for both sides
submits that the respondents have already deleted the impugned provision in the tender, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this writ petition is
dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
P.V.ASHA, JUDGE.
ww
S.R. VENUGOPALA PRABHU
THE KERALA INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIN (KINFRA)
KERALA INDUSTRIAL AND TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY ORGANIZATION (KITCO)
P.V. ASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
