Muraleedharan, v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Court disposed of a writ petition seeking direction to dispose of a transfer registry appeal. Directed Revenue Divisional Officer to consider and pass orders with notice to parties within two months.
What did the court decide?
Direction to Revenue Divisional Officer to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P5 appeal with notice to petitioner and affected parties within two months.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 29TH POUSHA, 1942
W.P.(C) No.1340 OF 2021(N)
PETITIONER/S:
MURALEEDHARAN, AGED 71 YEARS S/O.GOPALAN NADAR, TC NO.25, 3240, K.A.T.ROAD, VANCHIYOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695035.
BY ADV. SRI.LIJU. M.P
RESPONDENT/S:
- 1 STATE OF KERALA
REP. BY SECRETARY TO REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.
2 THE REVENUE DIVISION OFFICER, OFFICE OF REVENUE DIVISION OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, KUDAPPANAKUNNU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695043.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether mandamus can be issued to direct the Revenue Divisional Officer to dispose of an appeal within a specific time limit.
Whether the appeal pending before the 2nd Respondent requires notice to the petitioner and other affected parties before passing appropriate orders.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MURALEEDHARAN
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
THE REVENUE DIVISION OFFICER, KUDAPPANAKUNNU
- respondent
THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, COLLECTRATE
- respondent
THE TAHASILDAR (LR), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TALUK
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court