A.Arunachalam v. the Superintendent of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought police protection for a quarry. Petitioner’s counsel submitted the quarrying permit had expired. Court closed the petition reserving petitioner's right to move afresh after renewal.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(C) NO. 10237 OF 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V
MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 18TH SRAVANA, 1943
WP(C) NO. 10237 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
A.ARUNACHALAM
AGED 53 YEARS
S/O. ANNAMALAI CHETTIAR, SARAN ILLAM, ANANDHAN STREET, NALLEPILLY P.O, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD - 678 553
BY ADVS.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
A.ARUNACHALAM
- respondent
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALAKKAD
- respondent
THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOZHINJAMPARA
- respondent
SRI KAMUKAVEL
- respondent
SRI KARTHI
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court