Muhammadali Manekkathodi v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition challenging the selection process for a Commission President post, the Court closed the petition with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the selection after impleading the successfully selected candidate, as the current petition lacked necessary parties.
What did the court decide?
Closed with liberty to file a fresh petition after impleading the selected person.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 12TH KARTHIKA,
1943
WP(C) NO. 10235 OF 2021
PETITIONER/S:
MUHAMMADALI MANEKKATHODI, AGED 44 YEARS S/O. MOIDEEN, VALLAPUZHA POST, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD-679 336 PRESENTLY RESIDING AT CHOLAKKAL QUARTERS, NEAR KOPPAM HIGH SCHOOL, PULASSERY POST, PATTAMBI, PALAKKAD-679 307.
BY ADVS. B.KRISHNA MANI SMT.DHANUJA M.S
RESPONDENT/S:
- 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the selection process for the post of President, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, should be allowed in the absence of impleading the selected pers
Whether to grant liberty to the petitioner to challenge the selection process after impleading necessary parties.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MUHAMMADALI MANEKATHODI
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
THE SECRETARY CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court