High Court of Kerala dismissed a writ petition filed by four petitioners challenging the respondent university as infructuous on 14th Karthika 1943.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 14TH KARTHIKA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 10160 OF 2019
PETITIONERS:
1 PRIYA MAR. P.L., PURATHEZHATHU HOUSE, N.EDAKKOCHI, PAMBAIMOOLA, KOCHI-682 010
3 ROFIN JACOB, NALUPARAYIL HOUSE, VELIYANADU P.O., ALAPPUZHA 4 KAVYA PRAKASH, AWATHY BHAVAN, BALAGRAM P.O., THOOKUPALAM, IDUKKI BY ADVS. V.R.GOPU SRI.J.NARAYANA PILLAI
RESPONDENTS:
BY ADV SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM, SC, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 10160 OF 2019
2
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ
petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petitions is
dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
JUDGE
nak
WP(C) NO. 10160 OF 2019
3
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 10160/2019
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 25.3.2019 EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO,G3/138/2019/DPI DATED 29.3.2019 EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 29.3.2019 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed by the petitioners has become infructuous.
PRIYA MAR. P.L.
ROHIT AJAY
ROFIN JACOB
KAVYA PRAKASH
THE KERALA UNIVERSITY
THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
