The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam observed that the writ appeal was infructuous, having been rendered so by the order of the court below.
Writ appeal dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 16TH ASHADHA, 1943 WA NO. 912 OF 2011
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WPC 16001/2010 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT/S:
BY ADVS.
SHRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR, ASG OF INDIA ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL
RESPONDENT/S:
M/S.OFFICE DEVICES , A/201, AMRUT SAGARI, S.V ROAD, BORIVALI (W), MEMBAI-400 092, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MR.ATUL KAMDAR.
ADV PARVATHI FOR E.K.NANDAKUMAR
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WA NO. 912 OF 2011
2
J U D G M E N T
S.V.Bhatti.J.
The counsel appearing for the parties submits that the cause in the writ appeal does not survive and is rendered infructuous.
Statement is placed on record. Writ Appeal is dismissed as
infructuous, accordingly.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI JUDGE
Sd/BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE
JS
Union of India
Office Devices
S.V. Bhatti
Bechu Kurian Thomas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
