W.Vimala v. S.Sheeba
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ appeals preferred by teachers against a judgment allowing rival claims for appointment. Since S.Sheeaa was subsequently offered appointment, the Court disposed appeals by granting approval to W.Vimala and dismissing S.Sheeaa's petition as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Approval of W.Vimala's appointment with effect from 1.6.2010 granted; directions issued for disbursement of benefits; S.Sheeaa's petition dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 22ND BHADRA, 1943
WA NO. 784 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 7367/2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA,
ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT/6th RESPONDENT:
W.VIMALA AGED 49 YEARS
UPPER PRIMARY HIGH SCHOOL ASSISTANT (NOT APPROVED), ST. PAUL'S HIGH SCHOOL, KOZHINJAMPARA, PALAKKAD DISTRICT-678 555
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether approval of appointment to W.Vimala with back effect should be granted given the rival claim by S.Sheeaa.
Whether to make consequential orders in light of subsequent appointment granted to S.Sheeaa.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
W.Vimala
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
S.Sheeaba
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court