M.K.C.Kuttiyali v. Muhammadali
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a writ appeal against a Single Judge order in a trade rivalry dispute over fish vending in Perambra Fish Market.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was dismissed, maintaining the impugned order directing respondents to monitor the market and ensure access for those satisfying panchayat norms.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1943
WA.No.541 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 22947/2020(P) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 5,6,8 &9:
1 M.K.C.KUTTIYALI
AGED 63 YEARS
S/O. MOIDEEN, PARVEEN VILLA, MENNHANIAM, PERAMBRA,
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether appellants have the right to obstruct respondents from fish vending despite trade rivalry.
Whether the impugned judgment directing monitoring and access for those satisfying panchayat norms warrants interference.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
1 M.K.C.Kuttiyali
- appellant
2 Mujeeb K.K
- appellant
3 Ibrahim P.C
- appellant
4 Yoosuf M.K
- respondent
Muhammadali
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court