petitioner surprisingly, at the hospital in Ernakulam, when she came there for the pre-transplant evaluation for her earlier recipient. However, due to the mismatching in the diagnostic, the said proposal was rejected and the 2nd petitioner was awaiting the report in the hospital. In that moment, surprisingly she met the first petitioner there and when she came to know about her pathetic condition and ill-health, the second petitioner voluntarily came forward to donate her kidney to the first petitioner, since she has some personal acquaintance and sympathy to her. The family members of the donor have also no objection in the same. Therefore, the present evaluation that the donor has any other motive behind this kidney donation is meaningless and purely based on assumption. It is also a fact that there happened a typographical error while issuing a Certificate by the Local Body. Unfortunately, the President of the Ongallur Grama Panchayat, while noting his personal acquaintance mistakenly has typewritten as 6 years instead of 6 months. This minor mistake was taken as a reason for rejecting the joint application by the second respondent. Even though they clarified the same by submitting another certificate to the second respondent, it was not considered. The 2nd respondent rejected the application without considering the materials which are available on record to indicate that there is no commercial interest between the parties. The act of the 2nd respondent is inhuman.
