Appeal challenged a judgment closing writ petitions on fee adjustment. The High Court expressed no inclination to interfere and dismissed the writ appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 14TH ASHADHA, 1943 WA NO. 1826 OF 2009
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 12703/2007 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
RAVIKUMAR, S/O SHRI SEWA RAM, AGED 31 YEARS, R/O, KG-1/543, VIKAS PURI, NEW DELHI-110 018.
BY ADV SRI.SIVAN MADATHIL
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3:
BY ADVS.
SRI.MOHAN PULIKKAL SMT.MANJU RAJAN SRI.P.VIJAYAKUMAR, ASG FOR R3
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.A.No.1826 of 2009
:: 2 ::
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 5th day of July 2021
S.MANIKUMAR, C.J.
Instant writ appeal is filed challenging the judgment dated 22.6.2007 in W.P.(C)Nos.12702, 12703 & 14718 of 2007. Judgment impugned in this writ appeal reads as under:
“In all these three writ petitions the petitioners submit that now all the petitioners have been permitted to redo the first year again and therefore no further orders are necessary in these writ petitions. Accordingly, these writ petitions are closed. However, as directed in the interim order dated 20-6-2007 the respondents shall consider the claim of the petitioners for adjustment of the fees already paid towards fees for the 1st year sympathetically and equitably.”
Going through the memorandum of ground and material on
record, at this juncture we are not inclined to interfere with the
impugned judgment.
Writ appeal is dismissed.
sd/-
S.MANIKUMAR CHIEF JUSTICE
sd/-
SHAJI P. CHALY JUDGE
jes
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the learned single judge should have interfered with the judgment in the underlying writ petitions regarding fee adjustment.
Ravikumar
Director, Indian Institute of Management, Kunnanmangalam
Pgp Chairperson, Indian Institute of Management, Kunnanmangalam
Union of India
S. Manikumar
Shaji P. Chaly
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
