Rajesh N.C. v. Sivaraman
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal against judgment in W.P.C.5240/2021 directing Additional Tahsildar to enquire into land complaint. Bench upheld judgment allowing appellant to raise procedural grounds before the tribunal within time limits set by writ court.
What did the court decide?
Allowed ground to raise locus standi and jurisdiction before Additional Tahsildar within time limits; withdrew other grounds.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 12TH ASWINA, 1943
WA NO. 1266 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 5240/2021 DATED 20.5.2021 OF HIGH
COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT/S:
RAJESH N.C., AGED 49 YEARS, S/O CHENTHAMARAKSHNAN, PULINKAVU KALAM, VANDITHAVALAM P.O, CHITUR-678534.
BY ADV U.BALAGANGADHARAN
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Single Judge erred in entertaining the Writ Petition without specific locus standi documents.
Whether the matter is sub judice in the Civil Court thereby barring Writ Jurisdiction.
Whether the enhancement of time for disposal by the lower court warrants interference in the Writ Appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
RAJESH N.C.
- respondent
SHRI SIVARAMAN
- respondent
THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR(RE-SURVEY)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court