State of Kerala v. Joy Mathew
Case brief
What is this about?
Batch of writ appeals by the State against judgments striking down the word 'regular' in Rule 14E(b)(i), Part III KSR, which had been read as excluding prior service in leave vacancies in aided colleges from pensionary qualifying service. The Division Bench held that leave-vacancy service confers no lien and was never covered by the rule or the government orders, so no vested right was affected. T
What did the court decide?
Writ appeals allowed; the impugned judgments of the learned single judge are set aside and the writ petitions are dismissed.