Reetha, v. Ponnamma
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam dismissed a Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 145 of 2020 for non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to serve notice on the respondents' counsel within the granted timeframe despite receiving a warning of dismissal.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner granted time to serve notice; petition dismissed when time expired without action.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1943
TR.P(C) NO. 145 OF 2020
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 142/2017 OF FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA, ALAPPUZHA
PETITIONER/S/PETITIONER:
REETHA, AGED 34 YEARS W/O. SUNIL KUMAR, LAL BHAVAN, ALUMPEEDIKA P O, PRAYAR SOUTH, OACHIRA.
BY ADVS.
R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL
RESPONDENT/S/RESPONDENTS:
1 PONNAMMA, AGED 62 YEARS W/O. SOMAN, VALIYATHARAYIL, PUTHUPPALLY P O, KAYAMKULAM, 690527.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
REETHA
- respondent
PONNAMMA
- respondent
SUGANDHI @ MINI
- respondent
THAMBAN
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court