Parvathy v. Sai Raj
Case brief
What is this about?
Court allowed a transfer petition under Section 24 CPC seeking to move a restitution of conjugal rights case from Family Court, Mavelikkara to Family Court, Kollam due to the petitioner’s residence distance, age of parents, and lack of travel companions.
What did the court decide?
Ordering transfer of O.P. No.1179 of 2018 from Family Court, Mavelikkara to Family Court, Kollam and directing record transmission.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR
MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 21TH POUSHA, 1942
Tr.P(C).No.12 OF 2019
OP 1179/2018 PENDING BEFORE THE FAMILY COURT, MAVELIKKARA
PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
PARVATHY AGED 30 YEARS D/O. CHITHRADEVI, RESIDING AT CHAITHRAM, PUNUKANNOOR CHERI, ELAMBALLOOR VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT
BY ADVS. SRI.G.RANJU MOHAN SMT.M.SANTHI (K/868/2011)
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER:
SAI RAJ AGED 30 YEARS S/O. RAJENDRAN PILLA, RESIDING AT AISWARYA, MAHADEVIKADU MURIYIL, KARTHIKAPALLI TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-690 510
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a transfer petition seeking to relocate a family court pending restitution of conjugal rights case due to distance and lack of companionship should be granted.
Whether the ground of residence at 60 kms from the court seats is reasonable and legal for transfer purpose.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Parvathy
- respondent
Sai Raj
Coram
T.V. Anilkumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court