Dismissed
Thankamma v. P.K.Raghu
Kerala HCSA/396/2002
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU
FRIDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 7TH KARTHIKA, 1943
SA NO. 396 OF 2002
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN AS 14/1997 OF III ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM
OS 119/1994 OF II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM,
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2/PLAINTIFFS:
1 THANKAMMA, W/O THANKAPPAN PILLAI, REJANI VIHAR, POOKKALAM KARA,EDAPALLY SOUTH VILLAGE, KANAYANOOR TALUK
BY ADVS. SRI.K.RAVEENDRAN SRI.P.T.RADHAKRISHNAN
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT AND 3RD RESPONDNET/DEFENDANT:
1 P.K.RAGHU, S/O LATE KUMARA PILLAI, POOTHALATH PUTHENPURA, THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE, KANAYANOOR TALUK
2 P.K.ANIL S/O LATE KUMARA PILLAI, POOTHALATH PUTHENPURA, THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE, KANAYANOOR TALUK
BY ADV SRI.TOM JOSE FOR R1
THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD ON 29.10.2021, THE COURT
ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
SA NO.396/2002
2
K.BABU, J.
S.A. No.396 of 2002
Dated this the 29th day of October, 2021
JUDGMENT
The appellants are not represented today also. The respondent is represented. This appeal was earlier also dismissed for default on 26.06.2003 and was restored to file as per order dated 22.07.2003.
Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/K.BABU JUDGE
VPK
THANKAMMA
RADHAKRISHNAN
P.K.RAGHU
P.K.ANIL
K. BABU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court