Muthukrishna Reediar S.R. v. K.C.Sibi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed a second appeal in regular civil proceedings by default due to the non-appearance of both appellants and respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU
FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 14TH KARTHIKA, 1943
RSA NO. 613 OF 2006
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 292/1997 OF MUNSIFF COURT, CHANGANACHERRY, KOTTAYAM
AS 111/2001 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT / COMMERCIAL COURT,
KOTTAYAM,
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS:
1 MUTHUKRISHNA REEDIAR S.R. ROHINI BHAVAN, PUZHAVATHU, CHANGANACHERRY VILLAGE,, CHANGANACHERRY MURI, CHANGANACHERRY P.O.
2 M. NAVANEETHA KRISHNAN S/O. MUTHUKRISHNA REDDIAR, ROHINI BHAVAN,, PUZHAVATHU, CHANGANACHERRY VILLAGE,, CHANGANACHERRY MURI, CHANGANACHERRY P.O.
BY ADV SMT.N.SUDHA DEVI
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
K.C.SIBI, S/O.JOSEPH KURUPPANPARAMBIL HOUSE, PERUNAI WEST MURI,, CHANGANACHERRY VILLAGE, CHANGANACHERRY P.O.
BY ADV SRI.MOHAMMED RAFIQ
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
RSA NO. 613 OF 2006
JUDGMENT
The appellants are not represented. There has not been any representation for the appellants for the last so many postings. Respondent is also not represented. The Second Appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/-
K. BABU
JUDGE
hmh
MUTHUKRISHNA REEDIAR
M. NAVANEETHA KRISHNAN
K.C.SIBI
K. BABU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court