This revision petition presented for disposal was dismissed as infructuous because reliable information indicated the exparte order under challenge had already been set aside by the Family Court.
The revision petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
FRIDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 18TH ASHADHA, 1943 RPFC NO. 60 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN MC 552/2015 OF FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR, THRISSUR
REVISION PETITIONER/PETITIONERS:
ANITHA JOB ALUKKA AGED 47 YEARS W/O. JOB V. ALUKKA, FLAT NO. 301, JYOTHI TOWERS, RUKMINIPURI COLONY, DR. A.S. RAO NAGAR, HYDERABAD-500 062, NOW RESIDING AT SANKARATHIL HOUSE NEAR KUTTANELLOOR, NADATHARA VILLAGE, ERAVIMANGALAM P.O., THRISSUR TALUK, PIN-680 751.
BY ADVS. ALEX.M.SCARIA SMT.SARITHA THOMAS
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
JOB V. ALUKKA AGED 51 YEARS, S/O. VARKEY, PRESENTLY AT THERELEK ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED, PLOT NO. 70-71, PHASE 3, PEENYA, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA-560 058, HAILING FLAT NO. 301, JYOTHI TOWERS, RUKMINIPURI COLONY, DR. A.S. RAO NAGAR, HYDERABAD-500 062.
THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RP(FC).No. 60/2019
2
ORDER
The learned counsel for the revision petitioner fairly submitted that reliable information were received that the exparte order was set aside by the Family Court. As such, the present review petition has become infructuous. Hence the RF(FC) is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
SPV
ANITHA JOB ALUKKA
JOB V. ALUKKA
P.SOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
