Parthas Textiles, v. Hdb Financial Services Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
This review petition sought to fix a time limit for compliance of a direction in a connected writ petition concerning ECLGS extension. The court found the issue moot due to a subsequent order and noted that a new cause of action regarding unauthorised instalment deductions could not be raised in review.
What did the court decide?
No relief granted; the petition was dismissed as the specific direction became unnecessary due to a subsequent order and the new cause of action was not maintainable.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH
MONDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 19TH MAGHA,1942
RP.No.994 OF 2020 IN WP(C)No.25105/2020
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)No.25105/2020(K) DATED 27/11/2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C)No.25105/2020:
PARTHAS TEXTILES, P.B.NO.1774, M.G.ROAD, JOSE JUNCTION, ERNAKULAM - 682016, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, PRAVEEN RAJ RAJENDRAN.
BY ADV. SRI.C.AJITH KUMAR
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WP(C)No.25105/2020:
1 HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD., 2ND FLOOR, KALLUMKAL BUILDING, COLONY STOP, VAZHAKKALA, THRIKKAKARA (P.O.), KAKKANAD, KOCHI - 682 021, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a time limit must be fixed for the compliance of the direction in the connected writ petition.
Whether the new cause of action regarding deduction of instalments without concurrence can be adjudicated in this review petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
PARTHAS TEXTILES
- respondent
HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.
- respondent
NATIONAL CREDIT GUARANTEE TRUSTEE COMPANY LTD.
- respondent
THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court