Narayanan v. Parvathy
Case brief
What is this about?
The review petition filed to recall an earlier order dismissing a partition suit proceedings as due to non-prosecution was allowed on an application.
What did the court decide?
Earlier judgment is reviewed and recalled; matter remanded for appeal to be placed for final hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
MONDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 15TH BHADRA, 1943
RP NO. 843 OF 2020
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN RSA 827/2011 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 IN RSA:
- 1 NARAYANAN, AGED 68 YEARS, S/O. LATE PRABHAKARAN, CHIRACKAL HOUSE, ERU MATHALA
- KARA, ALUVA WEST VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK - 683 112.
- 2 VIJAYAN, AGED 66 YEARS, S/O. LATE PRABHAKARAN, CHIRACKAL HOUSE, ERUMATHALA KARA, ALUVA WEST VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK - 683 112.
BY ADV PAUL K.VARGHESE
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the earlier judgment dismissing the partition suit due to non-prosecution can be reviewed on the ground that defendants remained ex parte.
Whether the existing judgment of this court is liable to be recalled and reviewed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Narayanan
- petitioner
Vijayan
- respondent
Parvathy
- respondent
Radha
- respondent
Raveendran
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court