Dismissed

Sathiamma v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC15 Feb 2021RP/83/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala disposed of two review petitions arising from the same impugned judgment. Noting that the grounds already appeared in connected review petitions which were dismissed, the court rejected the present reviews. Plaintiffs in both connected petitions were Ramesh Kumar and Sathiamma respectively.

What did the court decide?

Grounds found to have been dealt with in connected review petitions; present petitions dismissed.

Sathiamma Vs State of Kerala — Writ and Judicial Review | Kerala HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

¶4

MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 26TH MAGHA,1942

¶5

RP.No.80 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 23150/2020

¶6

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 23150/2020(P) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

¶7

REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

¶8

RAMESH KUMAR.J AGED 54 YEARS S/O. JANARDHANAN, RESIDING AT PADMAVILASAM, THEKKETHERY P O, KOTTARAKKARA, KOTTARAKKARA, KOLLAM PIN-691522.

¶9

BY ADVS. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS SRI.SHAKTHI PRAKASH SRI.PRATHEEK VISWANATH SHRI.HARIKRISHNAN M.S.

¶10

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

¶11

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

¶12

2 THE DIRECTOR OF MINING & GEOLOGY DIRECTORATE OF MINING & GEOLOGY, PATTOM P O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695004.

¶13

3 GEOLOGIST MINING AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, KOLLAM DISTRICT OFFICE, ASRAMAM, KOLLAM PIN-691002.

¶14

4 CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD PARIVESH BHAWAN, EAST ARJUN NAGAR, NEW DELHI-110032, REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY.

¶15

RP.No.80 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 23150/2020 & RP.No.83 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 22847/2020

¶16

¶17

5 KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD PLAMOODU JUNCTION, PATTOM PALACE P O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695004, REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY

¶18

SRI.T.NAVEEN – SC SRI.M.AJAY – SC SMT.G.RANJITA - GP

¶19

THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15.02.2021, ALONG WITH RP.83/2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶20

RP.No.80 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 23150/2020 & RP.No.83 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 22847/2020

¶21

¶22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶23

PRESENT

¶24

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR

¶25

MONDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 26TH MAGHA,1942

¶26

RP.No.83 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 22847/2020

¶27

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 22847/2020(E) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

¶28

REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

¶29

SATHIAMMA

¶30

AGED 52 YEARS W/O.VIJAYA NATHA KURUP, R/O.IRATTAKALAYIL HOUSE, THENGAMAM P O, SOORANAD, PATHANAMTHITTA-690552.

¶31

BY ADVS. SRI.M.K.CHANDRA MOHANDAS SRI.SHAKTHI PRAKASH SRI.PRATHEEK VISWANATH SHRI.HARIKRISHNAN M.S.

¶32

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:

¶33

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

¶34

2 THE DIRECTOR OF MINING AND GEOLOGY DIRECTORATE OF MINING & GEOLOGY, PATTAM P O, THRIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695004.

¶35

RP.No.80 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 23150/2020 & RP.No.83 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 22847/2020

¶36

¶37

3 GEOLOGIST PATHANAMTHITTA MINING AND GEOLOGY DEPARTMENT, DISTRICT OFFICE, MINI CIVIL STATION, ARANMULA P O, PATHANAMTHITTA-689645.

¶38

4 CENTRAL POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD PARIVESH BHAWAN, EAST ARJUN NAGAR, DELHI-110032. REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY.

¶39

5 KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD PLAMOODU JUNCTION, PATTAM PALACE P O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695004. REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY.

¶40

SRI.M.AJAY – SC SRI.T.NAVEEN – SC SRI.K.J.MANURAJ – GP

¶41

THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15.02.2021, ALONG WITH RP.80/2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶42

RP.No.80 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 23150/2020 & RP.No.83 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 22847/2020

¶43

¶44

R.P. No.80 of 2021 in W.P.(C) No.23150 of 2020

¶45

and

¶46

R.P.No.83 of 2021 in W.P.(C) No.22847 of 2020

¶47

O R D E R

¶48

It is seen that the grounds on which the review of judgments is sought have been dealt with and rejected by this court in R.P. No.1 of 2021 and connected review petitions instituted seeking review of the very same judgment.

¶49

In the light of the order in R.P. No.1 of 2021 and connected review petitions, these review petitions are liable to be dismissed and I do so.

¶50

Sd/-

¶51

P.B.SURESH KUMAR, JUDGE.

¶52

Sathiamma v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sathiamma v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijayan M. Vs the District Collector

Meera@Ayisha Devi.T Vs State of Kerala

Kuttasseri Muhammed Kunhi Vs the Wandoor Grama Panchayath

John.M.Sebastian, Vs Marangattupilly Grama Panchayath

Shajahan Vs the Secretary, Vazhikadavu Grama Panchayath

Ramesh Kumar.J Vs State of Kerala