N.M.Rafeek v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Review petition dismissed without hearing because the respondent counsel stated that the petitioner was not pursuing the review.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 25TH POUSHA, 1942
RP.No.680 OF 2017 IN WP(C). 8807/2017
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 8807/2017 DATED 16-03-2017 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC:
N.M.RAFEEQ, NJARECKATTIL HOUSE, KUZHIVELIPADI, EDATHALA P.O., ALUVA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 683 561.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR SRI.K.ARJUN VENUGOPAL SMT.V.A.HARITHA SMT.MARY RESHMA GEORGE SMT.P.M.MAZNA MANSOOR SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR SMT.SANDHYA R.NAIR
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.M.rafeeq
- respondent
Union of India
- respondent
National Security Agency
- respondent
Central Bureau of Investigation
- respondent
Chief Engineer (NW), Military Engineering Services
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court