Razia v. Sujith
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court dismissed a review petition filed against a revision order. The Court held there was no error apparent on the face of the record and that the earlier order rejecting the plaint for non-payment of court fee attained finality.
What did the court decide?
Review petition failed and was dismissed; all pending interlocutory applications closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.V.ANILKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 07TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 17TH CHAITHRA, 1943
RP.No.195 OF 2021 IN CRP. 17/2021
AGAINST THE ORDER DTD 12.2.2021 IN CRP 17/2021 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/REVISION PETITIONER:
RAZIA
AGED 48 YEARS W/O.HAMZA, NO.38, SURYA NAGAR, CHANDRANAGAR P.O., PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT 678 007
BY ADV. SMT.P.USHAKUMARI
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
SUJITH AGED 44 YEARS S/O.SUKUMARAN, SURABHI, DURGA NAGAR, MANAPPULLYKAVU, KUNNATHURMEDU P.O., PALAKKAD DISTRICT 678 013.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court is justified in dismissing the review petition as no error is apparent on the face of the record.
Whether the Court below erred in declining to consider the amendment application while rejecting the plaint for non-payment of court fee.
Whether the revision petition was maintainable without challenging the original order rejecting the plaint.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Razia
- respondent
Sujith
Coram
T.V. Anilkumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court