K.Sathyaseelan v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
IN ST.Rev.. 286/2003 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
RP.No.145 OF 2004 IN ST.Rev.. 286/2003
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
TUESDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 11TH PHALGUNA, 1942
RP.No.145 OF 2004 IN ST.Rev.. 286/2003
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN ST.Rev. 286/2003 DATED 17-11-2003 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/S:
K.SATHYASEELAN PROPRIETOR, STOVE CENTRE, PATTOM, TRIVANDRUM.
BY ADV. SRI.E.P.GOVINDAN
RESPONDENT/S:
STATE OF KERALA
REP. BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,TAXES DEPARTMENT,, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, TRIVANDRUM.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR GP MOHAMMED RAFIQ
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
RP.No.145 OF 2004 IN ST.Rev.. 286/2003
-2-
O R D E R
Dated this the 2nd day of March 2021
S.V.BHATTI,J.
The instant Review Petition is one of the oldest Review petitions pending on the files of this Court, particularly, under Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963.
On 19.02.2021 and 22.02.2021 the case was listed and there was no representation. With a view to providing an opportunity to petitioner, the case stood adjourned to today. Today as well, there is no representation or any accommodation is sought for. Hence this Court is of the view that the cause in the Review Petition either has become ineffective or that the petitioner is not interested in working out the prayers.
Hence, the Review Petition is dismissed for default.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI
JUDGE
Sd/-
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
JUDGE
JS
K. Sathyaseelan
State of Kerala
S.V. Bhatti
Bechu Kurian Thomas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court