Justus P.J., v. Joshy E.K.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala in a review petition deleted a paragraph from the earlier judgment stating the tenth respondent had no right to use a specific building for recreation, as that issue was not adjudicated in the original judgment.
What did the court decide?
Deletion of the sentence stating the tenth respondent is not entitled to use the building for recreation activities.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.SURESH KUMAR
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 3RD PHALGUNA, 1942
RP.No.117 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 21734/2020
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.01.2021 IN WP(C) 21734/2020(N) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/10TH RESPONDENT:
JUSTUS P.J., AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH, PUTHANPURAKKAL HOUSE, PUDURUTHY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT-680 623.
BY ADV. SMT. PRABISHA T.P.
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 1 TO 9:
1 JOSHY E.K., S/O.KOCHUVARKEY MASTER, AGED 47 YEARS, EMMATTY HOUSE, PUDURUTHY P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT, PIN-680 623.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JUSTUS P.J.
- respondent
JOSHY E.K.
- respondent
WADAKANCHERY MUNICIPALITY
- respondent
SECRETARY, WADAKANCHERY MUNICIPALITY
- respondent
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, THRISSUR
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court