The appeal was dismissed because the memorandum filed did not press the appeal into service, resulting in no substantive adjudication of the merits.
The appeal was dismissed as not pressed into service.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 25TH BHADRA, 1943
RFA NO. 530 OF 2004
AGAINST THE ORDER AND DECREE DATED 30.06.2004 IN F.D.I.A 1578/1994 IN OS 53/1983 OF SUB COURT, VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE
APPELLANT/5TH RESPONDENT
KANNOTH BIYYATHU, D/o. AMMAD HAJI, RESIDING AT KOTTENTAVIDE, KAYAKKODI DESOM, KUTTIADY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.P.K.SURESH KUMAR SRI.K.P.SUDHEER
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER, R1,R4,R6 TO R12,LR’S OF R2:
7 KIZHAKKE PARAMBIL KUTTIALI PALERI AMSOM, VADAKKUMPAD DESOM, KOZHIKODE.
RFA NO. 530 OF 2004
2
R1 BY ADVS.
SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY SMT.SEEMA PARTHASARATHY
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 16.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RFA NO. 530 OF 2004
3
JUDGMENT
The appeal is not pressed into service. A
memo was filed in that behalf. Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
SPV
KANNOTH BIYYATHU
NHENOL KUNHI AVULLA HAJI
NHENOL AMMAD HAJI
NAMBIALAKATH KUNHAMI
CHERIYACHUZHALIKKARA CHATHU
KANIYAMKANDIYIL MARIYAM
P.SOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
