Appellants filed an appeal against a decree in OS 140/2014. Parties submitted a compromise petition signed by both sides and counsellors. The court disposed of the appeal based on the terms of the compromise.
First Appeal disposed of in terms of the compromise petition; court fee refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 22ND SRAVANA, 1943
RFA NO. 489 OF 2019
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.03.2019 IN OS 140/2014 OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, KOTTAYAM
APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
1 THOMAS JOSEPH, AGED 52, S/O.JOSEPH, MUKKATTU KAVUMKAL HOUSE, UMPIDY P.O., CHEMPAKARA KARA, KARUKACHAL VILLAGE, CHANGANASSERY TALUK. 2 SIBI JOSEPH, AGED 47, S/O.JOSEPH, MUKKATTU KAVUMKAL HOUSE, UMPIDY P.O., CHEMPAKARA KARA, KARUKACHAL VILLAGE, CHANGANASSERY TALUK,
3 JESMON JOSEPH, AGED 25, S/O.THOMAS JOSEPH, MUKKATTU KAVUMKAL HOUSE, UMPIDY P.O., CHEMPAKARA KARA, KARUKACHAL VILLAGE, CHANGANASSERY TALUK, KOTTAYAM. BY ADVS. SRI. ALEX.M.SCARIA SMT. SARITHA THOMAS
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
SATHEESH K.C., AGED 34 YEARS, S/O.CHELLASWAMY, KARTHIKA HOUSE, KARUKACHAL P.O., NEDUMKUNNAM KARA, NEDUMKUNNAM VILLAGE, CHANGANASSERY TALUK - 686 540.
BY ADV SRI.RAJEEV V.KURUP
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
13.08.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
R.F.A.No.489 of 2019
2
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 13th day of August, 2021
The parties had attended mediation process as directed by this Court and certain amicable terms, in settlement of issues have been arrived at. A compromise petition is filed before this Court incorporating the terms of settlement. Both the appellants and respondent have signed the compromise petition and their signatures have also been counter signed by the respective counsel.
In the above circumstances, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise petition filed. The compromise petition shall form part of the judgment. 1/3rd of Court fee alone is found paid and it shall be refunded to the appellants.
Sd/-
MARY JOSEPH
JUDGE
MJL
Thomas Joseph
Sibi Joseph
Jesmon Joseph
Satheesh K.C.
Mary Joseph
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
