P.F.Sabeenas v. Geeshma
Case brief
What is this about?
In RFA No. 481 of 2003, the Kerala High Court dismissed an appeal filed by P.F. Sabeeenas for non-prosecution as the appellant remained absent and provided no instruction despite being summoned.
What did the court decide?
[Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution due to non-appearance of appellant].
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 18TH BHADRA, 1943
RFA NO. 481 OF 2003
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT IN OS 74/2002 DATED 11.08.2003 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,KOCHI, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF IN OS NO. 74 OF 2002:
P.F.SABEENAS
AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.FRANCIS PULICKAL, RESIDING AT PULICKAL HOUSE, ST.BENEDICT EXTENSION ROAD, TRIKKANARVATTOM DESOM, ERNAKULAM, KANAYANNOOR TALUK.
BY ADVS. SRI.G.RAJAGOPAL SRI.THOMAS M.JACOB
RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS IN O.S.NO.74 OF 2002:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal should be allowed when the appellant fails to appear and provide instruction despite notice?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P.F.SABEENAS
- respondent
GEESHMA
- respondent
AJAYAGHOSH
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court