Kurumbakutty v. Thankamma
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
What did the court decide?
Appeals dismissed for non-prosecution due to lack of instruction from appellants and non-representation.
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
Appeals dismissed for non-prosecution due to lack of instruction from appellants and non-representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 2ND ASWINA, 1943
RFA NO. 162 OF 2006(E)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18/06/2005 IN OS 867/1994 OF II ADDITIONAL SUB COURT,THRISSUR
APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS 1 AND 2:
2 PADMAVATHY, AGED 70, W/O. NJAYAKKAT VASUDEVAN, MULANKUNNATHKAVU DESOM, KILLANNUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.
BY ADV SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFFS 1 AND 2 AND ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS 3 AND 4:
FOR R2: BY ADVS.SRI.K.B.GANGESH SMT.M.J.SAJITHA
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 24.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RFA NO. 162 OF 2006(E) & RFA NO. 595 OF 2007(F) 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 2ND ASWINA, 1943
RFA NO. 595 OF 2007(F)
AS 345/2005 OF DISTRICT COURT THRISSUR
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18/06/2005 IN OS 571/1998 OF
SUB COURT, THRISSUR
APPELLANTS/(DEFENDANTS NOS.2 AND 3):
RESPONDENT NO.1 (PLAINTIFF)/RESPONDENT NO.2 (DEFENDANT NO.1), RESPONDENT NOS.3 TO 6 (DEFENDANT NO.4 AND ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS NOS,5 AND 6:
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RFA NO. 162 OF 2006(E) & RFA NO. 595 OF 2007(F) 3
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants fairly submitted that there is no instruction from the appellants. The cases are of the years 2006 and 2007 respectively. Nobody represented the matter. As such, both the appeals will stand dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
msp
Kurumbakutty
Padmavathy
Thankamma
Padmini
P. Somarajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court