Dr.Paul K. Chandy, v. K.v.Shiraz
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioners challenged an appellate authority order regarding eviction. By leave of the court, the counsel sought to withdraw the original petition, which was allowed.
What did the court decide?
Guaranted withdrawal by the counsel for the petitioners leading to dismissal of the original petition.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021/14TH KARTHIKA, 1943
OP (RC) NO. 63 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 07.12.2018 IN I.A.NO.1494 OF 2018 IN R.C.A.NO.21 OF 2015 OF THE ADDITIONAL RENT CONTROL APPELLATE AUTHORITY-II (DISTRICT COURT), KOTTAYAM
PETITIONERS:
- 1 DR.PAUL K. CHANDY, AGED 56 YEARS S/O.ITTYIYERAH, MATTETHRA HOUSE, BAKER ROAD, PANAYAKAZHIPPU, KOTTAYAM PO 686001.
- 2 DR.ITTYIYERAH P CHANDY, AGED 23 YEARS D/O.DR.PAUL K CHANDY, MATTETHRA HOUSE, BAKER ROAD, PANAYAKAZHIPPU, KOTTAYAM PO 686001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dr. Paul K. Chandy
- petitioner
Dr. Ittyiyerah P. Chandy
- respondent
K. V. Shiraz
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court