Disposed

Kiran Raj S.S., v. Rani Vijayan

Kerala HC8 Jul 2021OP (FC)/338/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court directed the Family Court at Nedumangad to dispose of a restoration application in a divorce petition within two months due to delay in considering it by the lower court. The petition before the High Court was disposed of accordingly.

What did the court decide?

The Family Court was directed to dispose of the restoration application within two months. The main petition was disposed of.

Kiran Raj S.S., Vs Rani Vijayan — Matrimonial and Divorce | Kerala HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

¶4

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH THURSDAY, THE 8^TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 17TH ASHADHA, 1943

¶6

OP (FC) NO. 338 OF 2021

¶7

IN PENDING IA NO.1954/2019 IN OP 1231/2018 OF FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

¶8

PETITIONER/PETITIONER:

¶9

KIRAN RAJ S.S.,AGED 31 YEARS, RAJ BHAVAN, NEAR R C CHURCH, KALLAYAM P.O., VATTAPPARA (PART), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM KERALA 695043

¶10

BY ADV M.R.SARIN

¶11

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:

¶12

RANI VIJAYAN, D/O VIJAYAN. B, AGED 28 YEARS, VIJAYAGIRI, NJANDOORKONAM, POWDIKONAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695587

¶13

THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

O.P.(FC).No.338/2021

¶15

Dated this the 8^th day of July, 2021

¶16

A.Muhamed Mustaque,J.

¶17

This original petition was filed by the petitioner in O.P.No.1231/2018 on the files of the Family Court, Nedumangad. That petition filed for divorce was dismissed for default. Thereafter, he filed Ext.P2 application (I.A.No.1954/2019) to restore the above petition on file. On account of delay in considering Ext.P2 application, the petitioner has approached this Court.

¶18

Taking note of the facts and circumstances, we are of the view that the Family Court shall dispose of the above IA, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months.

¶19

This original petition is disposed of.

¶20

sd/-

¶21

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE

¶22

JUDGE

¶23

sd/-

¶24

DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH

JUDGE

kp True copy

P.A. To Judge

O.P.(FC).No.338/2021

-:3:-

APPENDIX

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

¶32

EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF OP NO.1231/2018 ON THE FILE OF FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD

¶33

EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE IA NO.1954/2019 IN OP NO.1231/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGAD EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY DR. PRIYA DEVI N, SENIOR PHYSICIAN & MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT AYUR VAID HOSPITAL IN BANGALORE DATED 01.06.2021

Kiran Raj S.S., v. Rani Vijayan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kiran Raj S.S., v. Rani Vijayan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tintu Poulose Vs Kurian John

R.Pradeep Kumar Vs R.Priya

Prasanth Mohan Das Vs Saranya Sasi

Savin Panattu Sudhakaran Vs Greeshma Gangadharan

Manoj.M.v Vs Anju C.B

Saranya J. Vs Pradeeshkumar S.