Usha v. Jose
Case brief
What is this about?
In Mat.Appeals 508 & 548 of 2014, this Court dismissed appeals arising from a Family Court order requiring the husband to return gold ornaments and pay their value. Upholding the lower court's finding that the property was purchased using the wife's gold, the Court affirmed the decision.
What did the court decide?
The appeals in Mat.Appeal Nos. 508 and 548 of 2014 were dismissed with no costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH
FRIDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1942
Mat.Appeal.No.508 OF 2014
AGAINST THE ORDER IN OP 82/1999 DATED 25-01-2014 OF FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR
APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS:
1 USHA
AGED 44 YEARS D/O.AUGUSTIN K.P., KALATHIPARAMBIL HOUSE, ANAPPARA DESOM, RAMAVARMAPURAM P.O., VILVATTOM VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK AND DISTRICT.
2 MINOR ANTHONY AGED 17 YEARS S/O.1ST PETITIONER AND RESPONDENT.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal against the Family Court's order allowing return of gold ornaments and pecuniary value of property utilized for the same should be allowed.
Whether the claim for return of gold ornaments based on photographs and admission of the husband is exaggerated.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Usha
- appellant
Joseph
- appellant
Minor Anthony
- appellant
Minor Shimsy
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court