So the compensation granted by the Tribunal under the head loss of dependency is reduced to this amount. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the insurance company that as against the settled law in Pranay Sethi (supra) the Tribunal granted funeral expenses as Rs.25,000/- as against Rs.15,000/-. In fact, this argument is also fairly conceded by the learned counsel for the original petitioner. In view of the matter, Rs.10,000/- is deducted under this hea d. Similarly towards loss of love and affection also, the Tribunal granted Rs.80,000/- as against Rs.40,000/-, under the head loss of love and affection settled by law. Since loss of love and affection is not permitted in cases of death, loss of consortium would suffice. Therefore, compensation under this head is also required to be interfered by reducing the same as Rs.40,000/- towards loss of consortium. Loss of estate in fact granted by the Tr ibunal comes to Rs.10,000/-, though the same can be up to Rs.15,000/-. Therefore, Rs.5,000/- is increased under this head. Thus the compensation granted by the Tribunal and this Court is as
