T.Babu v. Ajith Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant failed to effect service on the 3rd respondent despite a prior order. The court observed that the 2011 appeal was likely no longer prosecuted and dismissed it for default.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 16TH BHADRA, 1943
MACA NO. 773 OF 2011
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPMV 446/2004 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL,ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
APPELLANT/ADDITIONAL 3RD RESPONDENT:
T.BABU,S/O THANKAPPAN PILLAI, REMYA BHAVAN (KATTUVILA VEEDU), HOUSE NO.VI,, NEAR RADIO QUESK, PERUMKULAM P.O., (VIA), ALAMCODU.
BY ADV SRI.P.K.MUHAMMED
RESPONDENTS/APPLIANT & RESPONDENTS 1 & 2:
- 1 AJITH KUMAR, S/O RAJAPPAN NAIR ANILA VILASOM, MELATHINGAL, ALAMCODE P.O., ATTINGAL PIN - 695012.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
T.BABU
- respondent
AJITH KUMAR
- respondent
A.SASIDHARAN
- respondent
BIJU
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court