The High Court of Kerala dismissed a motor accident claims appeal for default, noting the appellant's failure to effect service of notice on the first respondent despite a previous order, and assuming lack of desire to prosecute the long-pending appeal.
The Motor Accident Claims Appeal was dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 22ND BHADRA, 1943
MACA NO. 1679 OF 2009
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPMV 176/2008 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS
TRIBUNAL TIRUR, MALAPPURAM
APPELLANT/S:
BY ADV SRI.P.BABU
RESPONDENT/S:
SRI.P.V.JYOTHI PRASAD SRI.K.P.SUDHEER
THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
13.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
2
MACA No.1679 of 2009
C.S.DIAS, J.
======================
MACA No.1679 of 2009
======================
Dated this the 13th day of September, 2021.
JUDGMENT
Despite the order dated 8.4.2021, the appellants have not taken steps to effect service of notice on the first respondent. The appeal is of the year 2009. Hence, it is assumed that the appellants are no longer desirous of prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
Sd/-
sks/13.9.2021
C.S.DIAS, JUDGE
Vadakkan Thari Ayishumma and others
Shahul Hameed T. and others
C.S. Dias
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
