Kerala State Mineral Development Corporation v. the Commissioner of Income Tax
Case brief
What is this about?
The Income Tax Appeal was dismissed because the appellant withdrew the appeal and placed the necessary statement on record.
The Income Tax Appeal was dismissed because the appellant withdrew the appeal and placed the necessary statement on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF JULY 2021 / 17TH ASHADHA, 1943
ITA NO. 40 OF 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DTD 15.09.2017 IN ITA 302/COCH/2015 OF
I.T.A.TRIBUNAL,COCHIN BENCH, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANT/S:
KERALA STATE MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ARCHANA, T.C.15/870, PRA-15, VINAYAKA LANE, VAZHUTHACADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695010 (PAN AAACK9746N) REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. SANJAY KAUL
BY ADVS. M. GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR K. JOHN MATHAI JOSON MANAVALAN KURYAN THOMAS PAULOSE C. ABRAHAM RAJA KANNAN
RESPONDENT/S:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695003.
BY ADVS. SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT SRI.K.M.V.PANDALAI, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.07.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ITA No. 40 OF 2018
-2-
J U D G M E N T
S.V.BHATTI.J.
Adv.Raja Kannan appearing for appellant does not press the Income Tax Appeal.
Statement is placed on record. Income Tax Appeal is
dismissed as withdrawn accordingly.
Sd/-
S.V.BHATTI
JUDGE
Sd/BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE
JS
Kerala State Mineral Development Corporation Archana T.C.
The Commissioner of Income Tax
S.V. Bhatti
Bechu Kurian Thomas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court