The First Additional District Court, Thalassery disposed of FAO (RO) No. 10 of 2021. The respondent/appellant counsel submitted that the 9th respondent/appellant was not pressing the appeal, stating a memo is filed, leading to dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 7TH ASWINA, 1943
FAO (RO) NO. 10 OF 2021
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15/02/2020 IN AS 109/2013 OF
1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, THALASSERY
APPELLANT/9TH RESPONDENT/CROSS APPELLANT IN AS:
NEENAMANI C.P., D/O. KAUSALLYA, AGED 61 YEARS, SUKINA, NEAR STADIUM GROUND, PUTHIYARA, CALICUT-673 004
BY ADVS. NIRMAL. S SMT.VEENA HARI SMT.RIA ELIZABETH JOSEPH SMT.IRENE ELZA SOJI
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT IN A.S & RESPONDENTS 2 TO 7 & 10 TO 15 IN
AS:
FAO (RO) NO. 10 OF 2021 2
BY ADVS.K. REMIYA RAMACHANDRAN-R1 R8 BY ADVS.R.SURENDRAN S.MAYUKHA
THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER - REMAND ORDER HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
FAO (RO) NO. 10 OF 2021 3
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant fairly
submitted that she is not pressing the appeal. A memo is being filed today. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
P.SOMARAJAN
JUDGE
msp
NEENAMANI C.P.
1 RAJAMANI C.P.
P.SOMARAJAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
