The Kerala High Court dismissed the first appeal filed by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited as infructuous after counsel submitted during arguments.
The First Appeal was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 10TH BHADRA, 1943
FAO NO. 44 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN I.A.619/2018 IN AS 37/2018 OF SUB COURT, SULTHAN BATHERY
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, KALPATTA OFFICE, FISHMARKET ROAD, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, KALPATTA AMSOM, VYTHIRI TALUK, WAYANADU DISTRICT.
BY ADV SRI.MATHEWS K.PHILIP,SC, BSNL
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF:
NIDHIMON MATHEW, S/O.THOMAS MATHEW, RESIDING AT KATTIVEETTIL HOUSE, MUZHAKKUNNU AMSOM, AVILAMVILAKODE DESOM, THALASSERY TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT-670001.
BY ADVS. SRI.K.R.AVINASH (KUNNATH) SRI.ABDUL RAOOF PALLIPATH
THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
FAO NO. 44 OF 2019 2
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant fairly submitted that the FAO has become infructuous. The submission is recorded. Hence, the FAO is
dismissed as infructuous.
P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE
msp
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Nidhimon Mathew
P. Somarajan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
