the Tribunal, we have perused the judgment under revision and are of the view that the contention is untenable from any view point. A reason in support of the said conclusion would certainly prejudice framing of scheme by the Board. The next argument is that the petitioners have a few circumstances/submission to bring to the notice of Wakf Board together with documents and the petitioners ought not to be shut out from filing representation together with the documents. The effort of scheme which is directed to be finalised by the Board must take care of all the exigencies and the Board ought not to refuse to receive inputs, suggestions, objections from all these stake holders, particularly, from the President and Secretary of the subject institution. In that view of the matter, we are of the view that the revision petitioners could be given six weeks time from the date of receipt of copy of the judgment to submit their suggestions and input/objections on any of the issues concerning the scheme proposed by the Wakf Board. The Board considers the input/objections presented by the petitioners along with other materials received in this behalf, finalises the scheme in
