days therefrom and also show cause as to why the said order shall not be made permanent. Thereafter by Annexure-B order, after hearing both sides, the preliminary order was made permanent. The Executive Magistrate, the Tahsildar, on the basis of Annexure-A order found that both the coconut trees are causing threat to the life and property of the 5th respondent, issued the order under Section 138 of the Cr.P.C. making the earlier order absolute and directing the petitioners who are the counter petitioners, to cut and remove the two coconut trees within 14 days therefrom and that if it is not obliged, it would be cut and removed at the cost and expense of the State. According to the petitioners, thereafter, by Annexure-C order dt. 27.01.2018 the 3rd respondent Executive Magistrate had found that the petitioners had tied the coconut trees safely, abating the threat posed to the property of the 5th respondent and passed order directing to safely tie the coconut trees abating the apprehension raised by the 5th respondent and also to install iron net, so that the nuts from the trees shall not fall on the property of the 5th respondent. Later, under Annexure-D order dt. 24.08.2019, an order was passed under Section 138(2) of the Cr.P.C. directing the petitioners to cut and remove the coconut trees within 14 days and aggrieved by the same the petitioners have moved this Court in revision.