is trite that this Court does not, normally, interfere with an order passed by the High Court granting or rejecting bail to the accused. However, it is equally incumbent upon the High Court to exercise its discretion judiciously, cautiously and strictly in compliance with the basic principles laid down in a plethora of decisions of this Court on the point. It is well settled that, among other circumstances, the factors to be borne in mind while considering an application for bail are: (i) whether there is any prima facie or reasonable ground to believe that the accused had committed the offence; (ii) nature and gravity of the accusation; (iii) severity of the punishment in the event of conviction; (iv) danger of the accused absconding or fleeing, if released on bail; (v) character, behaviour, means, position and standing of the accused; (v) likelihood of the offence being repeated; (vii) reasonable apprehension of the witnesses being influenced; and (viii) danger, of course, of justice being thwarted by grant of bail. (see: State of U.P. through CBI v. Amarmani Tripathi (MANU/SC/0677/2005: (2005) 8 SCC 21; Prahlad Singh Bhati v. NCT, Delhi and Anr. MANU/SC/0193/2001: (2001) 4 SCC 280; Ram Govind Upadhyay v. Sudarshan Singh and Ors. MANU/SC/0203/2002; (2002) 3 SCC 598).
